Skip to main content

Pension Bill updates Good and Bad

It's nearing the end of the legislative session so here's a snapshot of where we are at.

First the positive. SF4721/HF4514 has passed the Pension Committee. This Bill lowers PERA Correctional Plan Contributions and Employer Contributions as well as raising the COLA Cap from 2.5% to 3%. Read the summary here  https://www.lcpr.mn.gov/documents/mtgmaterials/2026/2026.04.07/SF4721-HF4514%20Summary.pdf

MNCORA submitted written testimony supporting this Bill. 


Now for the Bad. Bill HF708/SF1556 to add a PERA Correctional Officer seat to the PERA Board is stalled. 

Last session Senator Cal Bahr sat with MNCORA President Wade Laszlo and introduced the Bill to the Pension Committee. The Bill was heard last session but Pension Committee Chair Senator Nick Frentz laid it over. Meaning no vote was taken to move it out of Committee. 

PERA opposed this Bill because it would make the PERA Board even numbered (like the Teachers). We were advised that Amending the Bill to make one of the existing elected seats one dedicated to a PERA Correctional Plan member would "get less resistance." 

That Amendment was drawn up and sent to Rep. Peggy Scott's Office to be heard by the Pension Committee. To date there's been no progress. We also contacted Sen. Bahr's office as well as Pension Committee Chair Frentz.

It is our understanding that the last Pension Committee meeting might be April 14th. If the Amendment isn't heard or voted on or the original Bill voted on and passed it will die in Committee and we will be at ground zero again. 

It's hard to understand how a non-partisan Bill that gives a voice to PERA Correctional Officers on their own Pension and  literally has no cost can't progress.





Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Correctional Officers Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees

As of January 1, 2025,  Correctional Officers are Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees   the same as Police and Fire.  This has implications for disability, taxes and retirement. As we face new challenges to our pension in 2025 this will further the distinction between PERA General Plan members like 911 Dispatch and Probation and CO's in the PERA Correctional Plan. It's part  of the Secure Act 2.0. 26 USC § 72(t)()(10)  definition of Public Safety Employee - qualified public safety employee (10) Distributions to qualified public safety employees and private sector firefighters (A) In general In the case of a distribution to a qualified public safety employee from a governmental plan (within the meaning of section 414(d) ) or a distribution from a plan described in clause (iii), (iv), or (vi) of section 402(c)(8)(B) to an employee who provides firefighting services, paragraph (2)(A)(v) shall be applied by substituting “age 50 or 25 years of service u...
Read more

Notes from the August MNCORA Executive Board meeting

 We hope you're all enjoying your summer. The MNCORA Executive Board met August 3rd. Here's what's happening. There's a proposal from an Anoka County Detention Deputy, not a MNCORA member, who has met with PERA's Doug Anderson about raising the retirement payout from 1.9% to 2.2%. We met with him prior. MNCORA supports a higher payout but would want to see an actuarial of what affect it will have on our plan. Neither the Actuarial or a Bill to raise it would happen this year as it's a short session and last year was the budget year. It would not affect current retirees, but those still working. It would most likely require a larger contribution from both the employer and employee, that's why we want an actuarial. The Minnesota Duty Disability Association,  MNDDA  is raising money for a Lawsuit suing the State over HF 1234 and all the potential damage to those out on Duty Disability. They asked for our support. The Executive Board voted and supports this. We ...
Read more

Taking time off under the new State Statutes may impact your pension!

We are all aware of the new Minnesota Laws granting very generous paid time off. However looking at the PERA Agenda for December 11th there's a warning.  In their PERA Legislative Agenda it states: Minnesota Paid Leave Minn. Stat. 268.09 Subd. 6 (d)(3) addresses the impact of the paid leave law on pensions. Under this section, the employee cannot be penalized for vesting and eligibility purposes. PERA does not require an employee to be employed on a specific date to be credited with a year of service for vesting, contributions, or participation and PERA allocates service credit on a monthly basis. PERA grants service credit if the member earns PERA eligible salary in a month. We do not prorate service credit.  Since paid family and medical leave payments are provided by a third-party administrator, in this case the State, PERA is unable to collect contributions on these payments. Applying PERA's current statute, state paid family and medical leave program payments are not el...
Read more