Skip to main content

MNCORA Letter and Pension Work Group Meeting Cancelled

On November 8th MNCORA sent the following letter to the entire 911 Telecommunicator Pension Working Group. We did receive a response from Susan Lenczewski, Executive Director of the LCPR (Pensions and Retirement Commission).


MNCORA LETTER

November 8, 2021

 

(via email: chad.burkitt@lcpr.leg.mn)

 

Chad Burkitt                                                              

Legislative Commission on Pensions & Retirement

100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Blvd.

Room 55, State Office Building

St. Paul, MN 55155

 

RE:  911 Telecommunicators Pension Benefits

 

Dear Mr. Burkitt,

 

            The Minnesota Correctional Officer Retirement Association (MNCORA) strongly opposes the inclusion of 911 Operators, Dispatchers, and Telecommunicators in the PERA Correctional Plan. The Plan was established separate from all other job classifications because the job is unique among public employees. The inclusion of Dispatchers may deserve a better pension plan than they now have, but they do not belong in the Correctional Plan.

Dispatchers don’t fit the definition.

Dispatchers do not fit the definition of those permitted into the Correctional Plan. The Plan was established in 1999 for correctional officers serving in county and regional adult and juvenile correctional facilities due to the physical nature of their jobs. The members of this plan are responsible for the security, custody and control of the facilities and their inmates. Dispatchers who work solely in a dispatch role, and not a combined role of Jailer-Dispatcher, do not meet the job requirements to be let into the plan. The plan description would have to be changed, but it is important to recognize why it was written to be exclusive for correctional officers.

Correctional work is hazardous. Dispatch work is not.

            The Correctional Plan was established because a career working in correctional positions is physically hazardous and those choosing this career need an earlier retirement option than most other job classifications.

It is the recognized policy of the state that special consideration should be given to employees of governmental subdivisions who devote their time and skills to protecting the property and personal safety of others. Since this work is hazardous, special provisions are hereby made for retirement pensions, disability benefits and survivors benefits based on the particular dangers inherent in these occupations. The benefits provided in sections 353.63 to 353.68 are more costly than similar benefits for other public employees since they are computed on the basis of a shorter working lifetime taking into account experience which has been universally recognized.

Minn. Stat. § 353.63 Providing this earlier retirement option is expensive, so it is reserved for those providing essential government services which are difficult to do at age 65. Correctional Officers have high rates of assault, ranging from punches, bodily fluids thrown on them, shanks, rapes, and even murder. They also have high exposure to communicable disease like tuberculosis and SARS-CoV-2. High numbers of correctional officers became ill from COVID-19, and there have been outbreaks of TB among CO’s.

In contrast, 911 Dispatchers are not assaulted or exposed to blood and bodily fluids of inmates. 911 Telecommunicators work in a controlled environment that is not public-facing.  They have not been exposed to COVID-19 from inmates. 911 Telecommunicators are not responsible for the security, custody and control of the facilities and their inmates.

Treat Dispatchers and Correctional Officers Equitably.

The current proposal is to permit Dispatchers to transfer their time from other PERA plans into the Correctional Plan.  However, when the Correctional Plan was formed, Correctional Officers time in the PERA General Plan did not transfer over with them. They started fresh and it took 3 years to be vested. Now, it takes 10 years to be fully vested in the Correctional Plan.

Allowing 911 Dispatchers to transfer time in would be unfair to Correctional Officers and upset the financial stability of the PERA Correctional Plan. PERA Executive Director Doug Anderson estimated it would cost $79 million to add 911 Dispatchers to the PERA Correctional Plan. An Actuarial study must be done to determine the actual cost before any decisions can be made.

In summary, MNCORA opposes adding 911 Telecommunicators to the PERA Correctional Plan. Dispatchers do not fit the definition authorizing their entry. 911 Telecommunicators work in a safe office at a desk, so they do not have a hazardous duty that complies with Policy in § 353.63.  Correctional Officers have inmate contact and are regularly assaulted and exposed to disease in the course of their work.  911 dispatchers are seeking to credit years of service into a plan they have not paid into, a benefit not given to Correctional Officers. Finally, an Actuarial study must be done before any recommendation is made.

Sincerely,

The MNCORA Board

Email: MNCORA@protonmail.com

Phone: 612 346-8930

Website: MNCORA.ORG                                           


Note: The 911 Telecommunicator Pension Working Group meeting was cancelled by the Chair today November 9th, 2021.


Popular posts from this blog

Correctional Officers Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees

As of January 1, 2025,  Correctional Officers are Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees   the same as Police and Fire.  This has implications for disability, taxes and retirement. As we face new challenges to our pension in 2025 this will further the distinction between PERA General Plan members like 911 Dispatch and Probation and CO's in the PERA Correctional Plan. It's part  of the Secure Act 2.0. 26 USC § 72(t)()(10)  definition of Public Safety Employee - qualified public safety employee (10) Distributions to qualified public safety employees and private sector firefighters (A) In general In the case of a distribution to a qualified public safety employee from a governmental plan (within the meaning of section 414(d) ) or a distribution from a plan described in clause (iii), (iv), or (vi) of section 402(c)(8)(B) to an employee who provides firefighting services, paragraph (2)(A)(v) shall be applied by substituting “age 50 or 25 years of service u...

New Bill for Corrections seat on the PERA Board

MNCORA thanks Representatives Peggy Scott and House Leader Harry Niska for Authoring HF708 in the House and senators Cal Bahr and Jim Abeler for authoring the bill in the Senate SF1556 . Next step is for the LCPR to hear this Bill. Here's a link to the Pension Committee (LCPR). It's very important to contact them and ask them to give it a hearing for it to move on. https://www.lcpr.mn.gov/members.htm

PERA Board votes against CO seat-arguments. What's next and options

  On December 12, 2024 the PERA Executive Board voted unanimously not to  support legislation to add a Correctional Officer seat to the PERA Board. This is disappointing but will not dissuade MNCORA from again seeking a Bill with the Legislature. I would like to counter some of the PERA Boards arguments. At the planning meeting and in PERA's letter they argued that adding a seat would make the number on the Board even. So, we revised our proposal to add an additional Retiree seat. After all retirees are almost 30% of PERA membership and Retirees have only one member elected seat. In their letter they state, “ The current makeup of the board is 6 member positions to 3 employer positions, adding additional board members representing member groups would weigh the board’s makeup further towards the membership .” Not exactly true. It’s an 11 person board. Source PERA 2023 PFAR The 11 person Board is made up of 5 seats that are appointed by the Governor and one more is th...