Skip to main content

Pension Working Group meets November 9th- time for action

 The 911 Telecommunicators Pension Benefits Working Group meets again on November 9th.

The Agenda is out with 2 important Items: 

3. ACTION ITEM Preliminary vote: Is it the recommendation of the working group that 911 telecommunicators should receive enhanced pension benefits? (Note: this does not put 911 telecommunicators in a specific plan; that would be discussed under Item #4.) • Darlene Pankonie, Chair

 4. DISCUSSION ITEM If the majority vote on Action Item #3 is "Yes": − What enhanced benefits are recommended by the working group? − Should the working group recommend that 911 telecommunicators be moved into a specific plan; i.e., a correctional plan?

What can you do?

MNCORA is sending a letter stating our opposition to adding the 911 Dispatchers.

LELS sent along testimonial letters as stakeholders with their letter from dispatchers wanting in the PERA Correctional Plan. 

Correctional Officers are stakeholders of the Correctional Plan they seek to add Dispatchers to.

We are asking Correctional Officers and Retirees to send a letter of opposition to adding 911 Dispatchers to the PERA Correctional Plan send to:

MNCORA@protonmail.com 

Talking Points:

-State where you work, or worked and for how long.

-State why you are opposed to adding 911 Dispatchers to the PERA Correctional Plan.

-Did your time before entering the PERA Correctional Plan transfer in? If you've become licensed did your Correctional time credit follow you? They seek to join the Correctional Plan with past credit!

-How long before you were, or will be vested in the PERA Correctional Plan?

-Have you been assaulted or witnessed a CO assaulted on the job?

-Have you become sick with Covid or other diseases from inmates or know CO's that have?

-Put your first and last name at the bottom, or at least first name and last initial.(LELS letters are anonymous!)

We will be sending our letter to the Working Group before the Tuesday meeting and would like to pass CO letters along too, and will continue to accumulate for future actions.



Popular posts from this blog

Correctional Officers Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees

As of January 1, 2025,  Correctional Officers are Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees   the same as Police and Fire.  This has implications for disability, taxes and retirement. As we face new challenges to our pension in 2025 this will further the distinction between PERA General Plan members like 911 Dispatch and Probation and CO's in the PERA Correctional Plan. It's part  of the Secure Act 2.0. 26 USC § 72(t)()(10)  definition of Public Safety Employee - qualified public safety employee (10) Distributions to qualified public safety employees and private sector firefighters (A) In general In the case of a distribution to a qualified public safety employee from a governmental plan (within the meaning of section 414(d) ) or a distribution from a plan described in clause (iii), (iv), or (vi) of section 402(c)(8)(B) to an employee who provides firefighting services, paragraph (2)(A)(v) shall be applied by substituting “age 50 or 25 years of service u...

Notes from the August MNCORA Executive Board meeting

 We hope you're all enjoying your summer. The MNCORA Executive Board met August 3rd. Here's what's happening. There's a proposal from an Anoka County Detention Deputy, not a MNCORA member, who has met with PERA's Doug Anderson about raising the retirement payout from 1.9% to 2.2%. We met with him prior. MNCORA supports a higher payout but would want to see an actuarial of what affect it will have on our plan. Neither the Actuarial or a Bill to raise it would happen this year as it's a short session and last year was the budget year. It would not affect current retirees, but those still working. It would most likely require a larger contribution from both the employer and employee, that's why we want an actuarial. The Minnesota Duty Disability Association,  MNDDA  is raising money for a Lawsuit suing the State over HF 1234 and all the potential damage to those out on Duty Disability. They asked for our support. The Executive Board voted and supports this. We ...

Taking time off under the new State Statutes may impact your pension!

We are all aware of the new Minnesota Laws granting very generous paid time off. However looking at the PERA Agenda for December 11th there's a warning.  In their PERA Legislative Agenda it states: Minnesota Paid Leave Minn. Stat. 268.09 Subd. 6 (d)(3) addresses the impact of the paid leave law on pensions. Under this section, the employee cannot be penalized for vesting and eligibility purposes. PERA does not require an employee to be employed on a specific date to be credited with a year of service for vesting, contributions, or participation and PERA allocates service credit on a monthly basis. PERA grants service credit if the member earns PERA eligible salary in a month. We do not prorate service credit.  Since paid family and medical leave payments are provided by a third-party administrator, in this case the State, PERA is unable to collect contributions on these payments. Applying PERA's current statute, state paid family and medical leave program payments are not el...