Skip to main content

911 Telecommunicators Pension Benefits Workgroup

 This was the agenda for today's meeting:


Item 1 attendance turned out to be very important. The workgroup committee has only 2 Corrections Officers that can vote. The CO from Sherburne County chosen by PERA and the MSRS CO from the State were not there! (EDIT: After this posting it was learned the vote was scheduled when neither were available.)

This meant there was no corrections vote when it came to approving or arguing changes and the all important vote to approve and adopt the report! There is an Advisor a retired CO, Wade Laszlo. He was able to speak but unable to make motions to make  changes to the draft or vote on approval at this meeting.

The Chair stated that for something to have consensus there had to be no objections. So there was no consensus to improve the Dispatcher's pension and the line stating "Pension coverage for 911 Telecommunicators should not be changed to the PERA or MSRS Correctional Plans" was scratched before the meeting even started! However there will be no recommendation to add them to the corrections plan either.

The Dispatchers and dispatch groups were united on wanting to improve their plan including most wanting in on the Correctional Plans. The County and City Governmental Groups were against that, as well as the Correctional Officers (from previous meetings) were neutral on improving dispatcher's pensions but all against adding them to the Correctional Plan. 

What's next? The report and appendix will be presented to the Legislative Commission on Pension and Retirement. They can let it die, ask for additional study or use it to make recommendations to the full legislature.

MNCORA did object to the 7 anonymous LELS testimonials in the appendix and names were added to the letters.

The vote approved and passed the Final Draft.

We will publish the final draft when it is out. 


Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Correctional Officers Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees

As of January 1, 2025,  Correctional Officers are Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees   the same as Police and Fire.  This has implications for disability, taxes and retirement. As we face new challenges to our pension in 2025 this will further the distinction between PERA General Plan members like 911 Dispatch and Probation and CO's in the PERA Correctional Plan. It's part  of the Secure Act 2.0. 26 USC § 72(t)()(10)  definition of Public Safety Employee - qualified public safety employee (10) Distributions to qualified public safety employees and private sector firefighters (A) In general In the case of a distribution to a qualified public safety employee from a governmental plan (within the meaning of section 414(d) ) or a distribution from a plan described in clause (iii), (iv), or (vi) of section 402(c)(8)(B) to an employee who provides firefighting services, paragraph (2)(A)(v) shall be applied by substituting “age 50 or 25 years of service u...
Read more

Confusion at today's PERA meeting

 I attended the PERA Board meeting remotely today (3/13/25). As all of you know there's lots of pieces at play in the PERA pension plans. There have been in the recent past attempts by 911 Dispatchers and Probation to be merged into the PERA Correctional Plan which MNCORA has vehemently opposed. The positive note from todays meeting is that the current discussion is centered around improved pensions (earlier retirement) for probation and dispatch without talk of adding them to the Correctional Plan.  The sad part is the apparent confusion among PERA Board members as to the difference between Essential Employees and Public Safety Employees. Some were using the terms interchangeably which could lead to future problems.  While Police, Fire, Corrections, Probation and 911 Dispatch are all essential employees  https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/179A.03 . Only Police, Fire and Correctional Officers are Public Safety! The Secure Act 2.0 spells out changes to the defi...
Read more

Notes from the August MNCORA Executive Board meeting

 We hope you're all enjoying your summer. The MNCORA Executive Board met August 3rd. Here's what's happening. There's a proposal from an Anoka County Detention Deputy, not a MNCORA member, who has met with PERA's Doug Anderson about raising the retirement payout from 1.9% to 2.2%. We met with him prior. MNCORA supports a higher payout but would want to see an actuarial of what affect it will have on our plan. Neither the Actuarial or a Bill to raise it would happen this year as it's a short session and last year was the budget year. It would not affect current retirees, but those still working. It would most likely require a larger contribution from both the employer and employee, that's why we want an actuarial. The Minnesota Duty Disability Association,  MNDDA  is raising money for a Lawsuit suing the State over HF 1234 and all the potential damage to those out on Duty Disability. They asked for our support. The Executive Board voted and supports this. We ...
Read more