Skip to main content

PERA is recommending a major change to Disability Pensions

The PERA Board held a Special meeting on March 2nd. 

There were two main items. 

Duty Disability Provisions-which supports  SF 1959/HF 1234 "The bill also requires members who apply for a duty disability benefit based on a psychological condition to complete twenty-four weeks of treatment before a final determination for a duty disability can be granted." 

And what was labeled PERA Police & Fire Disability Modifications on the Agenda.

At the end of page 5 PERA recommends a change that will affect ALL PERA pensions including the PERA Correctional Plan.

It reads, "Staff Recommendation for Disability Reapplication The PERA staff recommends modifying Minn. Stat. §353.031, subd. 8 to set clear expectations for all of PERA’s members and clarify requirements. The recommended changes will clearly state that the member is responsible to reapply for the disability benefit once a year for the first five years and once every three years after that. Language will clarify that the burden of proof remains with the member in the event of an appeal."

What does this mean? It is a reversal  of Administrative law changing the burden of proof  from PERA to the disabled member!

The switching of the burden of proof from PERA to the member would be a major change of decades of precedent with the Administrative Law judges who hear these cases.

It could be costly too. Corrections Officers collecting a Disability Pension are usually without the necessary funds to hire an attorney to fight PERA on a denied appeal. It's like making a crime victim prove they are the victim.

MNCORA objects to the change based on current law, decades long past practice, cost to the disabled members and the fact there was no notification to PERA Correctional Plan members or other PERA Pension members, just Police and Fire for input.

MNCORA has written the members of the Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement voicing our objection.

Popular posts from this blog

Correctional Officers Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees

As of January 1, 2025,  Correctional Officers are Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees   the same as Police and Fire.  This has implications for disability, taxes and retirement. As we face new challenges to our pension in 2025 this will further the distinction between PERA General Plan members like 911 Dispatch and Probation and CO's in the PERA Correctional Plan. It's part  of the Secure Act 2.0. 26 USC § 72(t)()(10)  definition of Public Safety Employee - qualified public safety employee (10) Distributions to qualified public safety employees and private sector firefighters (A) In general In the case of a distribution to a qualified public safety employee from a governmental plan (within the meaning of section 414(d) ) or a distribution from a plan described in clause (iii), (iv), or (vi) of section 402(c)(8)(B) to an employee who provides firefighting services, paragraph (2)(A)(v) shall be applied by substituting “age 50 or 25 years of service u...
Read more

New Bill for Corrections seat on the PERA Board

MNCORA thanks Representatives Peggy Scott and House Leader Harry Niska for Authoring HF708 in the House and senators Cal Bahr and Jim Abeler for authoring the bill in the Senate SF1556 . Next step is for the LCPR to hear this Bill. Here's a link to the Pension Committee (LCPR). It's very important to contact them and ask them to give it a hearing for it to move on. https://www.lcpr.mn.gov/members.htm
Read more

Confusion at today's PERA meeting

 I attended the PERA Board meeting remotely today (3/13/25). As all of you know there's lots of pieces at play in the PERA pension plans. There have been in the recent past attempts by 911 Dispatchers and Probation to be merged into the PERA Correctional Plan which MNCORA has vehemently opposed. The positive note from todays meeting is that the current discussion is centered around improved pensions (earlier retirement) for probation and dispatch without talk of adding them to the Correctional Plan.  The sad part is the apparent confusion among PERA Board members as to the difference between Essential Employees and Public Safety Employees. Some were using the terms interchangeably which could lead to future problems.  While Police, Fire, Corrections, Probation and 911 Dispatch are all essential employees  https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/179A.03 . Only Police, Fire and Correctional Officers are Public Safety! The Secure Act 2.0 spells out changes to the defi...
Read more