Skip to main content

PERA Board vote on CO seat

On October 12th the PERA Board voted unanimously NOT to recommend legislation for a CO seat on the PERA Board.  

They want no legislation on it this year. They understand CO's wanting a voice on their plan and agreed to discuss it at their workshop next year.

In other words the can was kicked down the road.

It is not necessary to have the PERA Board's support as all pension changes come from the Minnesota Legislature. We have a good working relationship with the PERA Board and we didn't want to blindside the Executive Director with this and hoped for their support, but we will proceed taking the legislative path.

For too long our PERA Correctional Plan has had threats to it with little to no warning or input.

-The 2018 'share the pain' which changed our COLA from an annual 2.5% to a variable one based on Social Security's raise capping us at 2.5% resulting in years with a lower COLA.

-The attempt two years ago to add dispatchers to our pension which would have resulted in a $79 million hit to our plan.

-Last years 'Police and Fire' Bill HF1234 that changed our disability!

-Last years omnibus bill that gives a higher Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) to every PERA pension for 2024 except the PERA Correctional Plan!

The path forward is two possible ways.

Preferred is to get our own dedicated seat on the PERA Board.

The second is to get added to the Police and Fire seat if option one fails. President Biden's Inflation Reduction Act contains the Secure Act 2.0  which designates that all County and City CO's are Public Safety Officers effective January 1, 2025. The Police and Fire seat on the PERA Board is a Public Safety seat!

Let's see what this year holds!


Popular posts from this blog

Correctional Officers Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees

As of January 1, 2025,  Correctional Officers are Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees   the same as Police and Fire.  This has implications for disability, taxes and retirement. As we face new challenges to our pension in 2025 this will further the distinction between PERA General Plan members like 911 Dispatch and Probation and CO's in the PERA Correctional Plan. It's part  of the Secure Act 2.0. 26 USC § 72(t)()(10)  definition of Public Safety Employee - qualified public safety employee (10) Distributions to qualified public safety employees and private sector firefighters (A) In general In the case of a distribution to a qualified public safety employee from a governmental plan (within the meaning of section 414(d) ) or a distribution from a plan described in clause (iii), (iv), or (vi) of section 402(c)(8)(B) to an employee who provides firefighting services, paragraph (2)(A)(v) shall be applied by substituting “age 50 or 25 years of service u...
Read more

Notes from the August MNCORA Executive Board meeting

 We hope you're all enjoying your summer. The MNCORA Executive Board met August 3rd. Here's what's happening. There's a proposal from an Anoka County Detention Deputy, not a MNCORA member, who has met with PERA's Doug Anderson about raising the retirement payout from 1.9% to 2.2%. We met with him prior. MNCORA supports a higher payout but would want to see an actuarial of what affect it will have on our plan. Neither the Actuarial or a Bill to raise it would happen this year as it's a short session and last year was the budget year. It would not affect current retirees, but those still working. It would most likely require a larger contribution from both the employer and employee, that's why we want an actuarial. The Minnesota Duty Disability Association,  MNDDA  is raising money for a Lawsuit suing the State over HF 1234 and all the potential damage to those out on Duty Disability. They asked for our support. The Executive Board voted and supports this. We ...
Read more

Taking time off under the new State Statutes may impact your pension!

We are all aware of the new Minnesota Laws granting very generous paid time off. However looking at the PERA Agenda for December 11th there's a warning.  In their PERA Legislative Agenda it states: Minnesota Paid Leave Minn. Stat. 268.09 Subd. 6 (d)(3) addresses the impact of the paid leave law on pensions. Under this section, the employee cannot be penalized for vesting and eligibility purposes. PERA does not require an employee to be employed on a specific date to be credited with a year of service for vesting, contributions, or participation and PERA allocates service credit on a monthly basis. PERA grants service credit if the member earns PERA eligible salary in a month. We do not prorate service credit.  Since paid family and medical leave payments are provided by a third-party administrator, in this case the State, PERA is unable to collect contributions on these payments. Applying PERA's current statute, state paid family and medical leave program payments are not el...
Read more