Skip to main content

The Numbers

The Star Tribune ran an article written by reporter Randy Furst who attended the March 20th LCPR meeting at the Minnesota State Capitol.

The article outlines extremely well the costs of Police PTSD on the PERA Police and Fire  retirement fund. The article quotes PERA Executive Director Doug Anderson, 

"We are estimating that the police and fire pension plan is costing $40 million more per year than we previously expected," .... "If there is no change in that trend, it accelerates the decline in the funding status."

Unless disability pension applications by law enforcement officers and firefighters drop dramatically, cities and counties — as well as current public safety workers — will need to ratchet up their pension contributions, Anderson said."

MNCORA recognizes the Police and Fire fund is in trouble. However the PERA Correctional Plan IS NOT!

Here's the numbers from the LCPR (MN Public Pension Plan Statistics as of 6-30-2021.docx).


Police and Fire has 1,684 officers out on disability alone (the majority being PTSD). 

The PERA Correctional Plan has 1,277 on regular retirement and only 216 on disability. It should be noted Correctional disability is largely on duty physical injuries not PTSD.

The numbers show Police and Fire have more officers out on disability than the PERA Correctional Plan has on total retirement!

So again MNCORA poses the question, "Why is the PERA Correctional Plan disability process being lumped in with Police and Fire?" They are two separate plans! The Correctional Plan is not costing $40 million more per year than expected. 



Popular posts from this blog

Correctional Officers Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees

As of January 1, 2025,  Correctional Officers are Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees   the same as Police and Fire.  This has implications for disability, taxes and retirement. As we face new challenges to our pension in 2025 this will further the distinction between PERA General Plan members like 911 Dispatch and Probation and CO's in the PERA Correctional Plan. It's part  of the Secure Act 2.0. 26 USC § 72(t)()(10)  definition of Public Safety Employee - qualified public safety employee (10) Distributions to qualified public safety employees and private sector firefighters (A) In general In the case of a distribution to a qualified public safety employee from a governmental plan (within the meaning of section 414(d) ) or a distribution from a plan described in clause (iii), (iv), or (vi) of section 402(c)(8)(B) to an employee who provides firefighting services, paragraph (2)(A)(v) shall be applied by substituting “age 50 or 25 years of service u...
Read more

New Bill for Corrections seat on the PERA Board

MNCORA thanks Representatives Peggy Scott and House Leader Harry Niska for Authoring HF708 in the House and senators Cal Bahr and Jim Abeler for authoring the bill in the Senate SF1556 . Next step is for the LCPR to hear this Bill. Here's a link to the Pension Committee (LCPR). It's very important to contact them and ask them to give it a hearing for it to move on. https://www.lcpr.mn.gov/members.htm
Read more

MAPE and Teamsters gearing up for pension raid?

Currently there's an MSRS Correctional Plan Eligibility Work Group   looking at who and should and should not be in the MSRS (State) Correctional Plan. The recommendations are due to the LCPR by January 10, 2025.  As always there's a letter citing MAPE and Teamsters desire to add Probation Officers to both the MSRS and PERA Correctional Plans . Because why wouldn't they try this again out of our sight? Last year of course there was the Bill to add Dispatch to our Correctional Plan, and Rep. Wolgamott (the author) stated the issue was not dead. We fully expect another attempt this year. The last line of MAPE's letter says it all: This upcoming session will be challenging with possibly probation and dispatch both making a run at our pension. MNCORA will be watching. We plan to again submit a Bill to add a CO to the PERA Board (Something State CO's have). Last year Representative Niska authored it, but the LCPR declined to give it a hearing. This session Rep. Niska w...
Read more