Skip to main content

The Numbers

The Star Tribune ran an article written by reporter Randy Furst who attended the March 20th LCPR meeting at the Minnesota State Capitol.

The article outlines extremely well the costs of Police PTSD on the PERA Police and Fire  retirement fund. The article quotes PERA Executive Director Doug Anderson, 

"We are estimating that the police and fire pension plan is costing $40 million more per year than we previously expected," .... "If there is no change in that trend, it accelerates the decline in the funding status."

Unless disability pension applications by law enforcement officers and firefighters drop dramatically, cities and counties — as well as current public safety workers — will need to ratchet up their pension contributions, Anderson said."

MNCORA recognizes the Police and Fire fund is in trouble. However the PERA Correctional Plan IS NOT!

Here's the numbers from the LCPR (MN Public Pension Plan Statistics as of 6-30-2021.docx).


Police and Fire has 1,684 officers out on disability alone (the majority being PTSD). 

The PERA Correctional Plan has 1,277 on regular retirement and only 216 on disability. It should be noted Correctional disability is largely on duty physical injuries not PTSD.

The numbers show Police and Fire have more officers out on disability than the PERA Correctional Plan has on total retirement!

So again MNCORA poses the question, "Why is the PERA Correctional Plan disability process being lumped in with Police and Fire?" They are two separate plans! The Correctional Plan is not costing $40 million more per year than expected. 



Popular posts from this blog

Correctional Officers Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees

As of January 1, 2025,  Correctional Officers are Federally Recognized as Public Safety Employees   the same as Police and Fire.  This has implications for disability, taxes and retirement. As we face new challenges to our pension in 2025 this will further the distinction between PERA General Plan members like 911 Dispatch and Probation and CO's in the PERA Correctional Plan. It's part  of the Secure Act 2.0. 26 USC § 72(t)()(10)  definition of Public Safety Employee - qualified public safety employee (10) Distributions to qualified public safety employees and private sector firefighters (A) In general In the case of a distribution to a qualified public safety employee from a governmental plan (within the meaning of section 414(d) ) or a distribution from a plan described in clause (iii), (iv), or (vi) of section 402(c)(8)(B) to an employee who provides firefighting services, paragraph (2)(A)(v) shall be applied by substituting “age 50 or 25 years of service u...

New Bill for Corrections seat on the PERA Board

MNCORA thanks Representatives Peggy Scott and House Leader Harry Niska for Authoring HF708 in the House and senators Cal Bahr and Jim Abeler for authoring the bill in the Senate SF1556 . Next step is for the LCPR to hear this Bill. Here's a link to the Pension Committee (LCPR). It's very important to contact them and ask them to give it a hearing for it to move on. https://www.lcpr.mn.gov/members.htm

Confusion at today's PERA meeting

 I attended the PERA Board meeting remotely today (3/13/25). As all of you know there's lots of pieces at play in the PERA pension plans. There have been in the recent past attempts by 911 Dispatchers and Probation to be merged into the PERA Correctional Plan which MNCORA has vehemently opposed. The positive note from todays meeting is that the current discussion is centered around improved pensions (earlier retirement) for probation and dispatch without talk of adding them to the Correctional Plan.  The sad part is the apparent confusion among PERA Board members as to the difference between Essential Employees and Public Safety Employees. Some were using the terms interchangeably which could lead to future problems.  While Police, Fire, Corrections, Probation and 911 Dispatch are all essential employees  https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/179A.03 . Only Police, Fire and Correctional Officers are Public Safety! The Secure Act 2.0 spells out changes to the defi...